http://naml.us/blog/2008/12/visualizing-collisions Geoffrey Irving Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:31:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://naml.us/blog/2008/12/visualizing-collisions#comment-7 JTeran Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:54:22 +0000 http://naml.us/blog/?p=81#comment-7 <p>Yeah, my attempts to visualize the colliding pairs (as I described them above) were not as nice as this.</p> Yeah, my attempts to visualize the colliding pairs (as I described them above) were not as nice as this.

]]> http://naml.us/blog/2008/12/visualizing-collisions#comment-6 irving Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:44:37 +0000 http://naml.us/blog/?p=81#comment-6 <p>No, it's all pairs within a small multiple of the repulsion thickness, to be used as candidates for history based repulsions, so maybe "contact pairs" would be a better term. The actually colliding pairs are a smaller subset.</p> No, it’s all pairs within a small multiple of the repulsion thickness, to be used as candidates for history based repulsions, so maybe “contact pairs” would be a better term. The actually colliding pairs are a smaller subset.

]]> http://naml.us/blog/2008/12/visualizing-collisions#comment-5 JTeran Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:38:47 +0000 http://naml.us/blog/?p=81#comment-5 <p>This is all egde/edge and point/face pairs determined to be on a collision course by the cubic solve over one dt?</p> This is all egde/edge and point/face pairs determined to be on a collision course by the cubic solve over one dt?

]]>